The issue on appeal was whether the injured person (Miller) had filed a complaint that stated a cause of action in negligence. The trial court had dismissed the complaint, but the Court of Appeals held that it satisfied the requirements of the law. It was a short and plain statement of the claim that the trainer was negligent.
Appellant, Karyn Miller, fell from her horse and was injured while participating in an equestrian event. Following this incident, Miller filed suit against several defendants, including appellee, Linda Foster, Miller's equestrian trainer and supervisor. The complaint alleged that Foster was negligent in failing to properly supervise Miller when the horse Miller was riding became spooked by the noise of a passing motor scooter causing Miller's fall. This appeal arises from the trial court's dismissal with prejudice of that count of Miller's third amended complaint directed to Foster. We have reviewed the third amended complaint and find that it does, in fact, state a negligence cause of action.
The elements of a negligence cause of action are duty, breach, causation, and damages. Paterson v. Deeb, 472 So.2d 1210, 1214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), review denied, 484 So.2d 8 (Fla.1986).
In order to state a cause of action, a complaint need only contain a short and plain statement as to the ultimate facts which indicate that the pleader is entitled to relief.... In short, if the pleader alleges the necessary elements of the cause of action, the complaint states a cause of action.
Shahid v. Campbell, 552 So.2d 321, 322 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
Here, Miller's third amended complaint sufficiently alleged all of the elements of a negligence cause of action. We, therefore, reverse the trial court's dismissal of the third amended complaint.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
GLICKSTEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.
Return to Top of This Page
Return to Mounted Accidents Page